Welcome to the main FAQ page for The Land List!
While I welcome the questions and comments that visitors (like you!) send me, I'd like to encourage you to read over this page to see if I've already answered your question here. If not, feel free to ask!
You can still get film in the two pack-film formats (the 'rectangular'
and 'square' pack formats), plus the SX-70, 600, Spectra/Image,
Captiva/Vision and other later integral print formats.
If you're not sure, you can easily determine on this site what film
your camera uses and whether or not that film is still available.
Just go to the Camera List main page,
and find your camera in the alphabetical index. Click on the link,
and you'll be at the specific camera information listing for your
camera. On the camera listings pages, there is a small rectangular
icon located just to the left of each camera name. That icon indicates
the film format used by that camera. Clicking on the film icon takes
you directly to the Film List section
for that film format. This will tell you what film(s) are/were made
in that format, and which ones (if any) are still being produced.
Actually, before 1992, the only 'amateur' Polaroid camera models that you
could not get film for were the 80 series (Highlander)
models, the J33, the Model 20 'Swinger' (plus the similar M15 and 415) and
the Polavision movie camera. Now with the 40-series rollfilms gone,
the list of 'filmless' Polaroid cameras is longer, but many people
are still surprised when they find out that their old Model 100 automatic
pack camera not only still has film available for it, but it's
even available in a far wider variety than ever!
Please see the Battery FAQ page.
[NOTE: I'm including this question in this FAQ list simply because
I get asked this sort of thing very often. On the one hand, I really don't
want to turn this into some sort of 'price guide' thing, but on the
other hand, it's a valid question that deserves an answer.]
Sorry to say, but chances are, it's probably not worth more than a few
dollars. ...And that'd be assuming you could find
anyone who wanted it in the first place. This is true of most
mass-market Polaroid cameras regardless of format. Even those
big old rollfilm Polaroid cameras (such as the
95-series or
150 or
800 or...)
with their beautiful genuine leather cases and
neatly packaged accessories just aren't worth much of anything
in the "collectible" market right now.
This doesn't mean, however, that there aren't any old Polaroid
cameras that are worth some money. The thing is, though, that those
particular cameras aren't considered valuable due to 'collectibility',
but due to their current intrinsic value as usable photographic tools.
Here's a short list of Polaroid cameras that actually have some reasonable
sort of market value in the USA:
IMPORTANT NOTE:
As for prices outside North America, a few Polaroid cameras enjoy a bit more
demand and slightly higher values compared with the USA. In particular,
early rollfilm models (especially the original Model 95) and high-end
automatic packfilm cameras (such as the Automatic 100 or 250 or the like)
are worth a bit more in some areas (or are at least easier to find buyers
for).
To summarize, you're probably not going to get wealthy selling the old
Polaroid camera that's sitting in your attic, at least right now. But
that doesn't mean you can't have some fun with it anyway. :-)
[Ed. Note: I realize this FAQ entry sounds redundant, but since about
one-third to one-half of the visitors who email me about this site
continue to ask me how much their camera is worth, I figure I need to
elaborate further. --MK]
Again, this site is not intended to be an official "price guide" of any sort.
I realize that while I did not itemize every single Polaroid camera in the
previous FAQ entry, I'd like to repeat that basically any
camera not specifically listed is quite possible to buy in the
USA for about 10 bucks or less from an individual seller (you may pay more,
but the possibility is there).
I do apologize if that sounds a bit 'cold', but that's the way the market is
at this time and place. However, so as not to appear that
I'm ducking the issue or being overly terse, I would like to
elaborate by offering the following notes:
At any rate, have fun with your camera! ...And if there's film available
for it, I'd like to invite you to take some pictures with it too. After
all, that's what it was designed for in the first place. :-)
In my opinion, there aren't any Polaroid cameras that are truly
"rare" with the exception of the
185 packfilm camera.
However, some are definitely less common than others. Mind you,
this doesn't currently make them really worth more in terms of selling
price, since the number of people who want the things still seems
to be less than the number of cameras out there, but for those
score-keepers among us who want a rough idea of what's easy/difficult
to find, here's a rough guide for Polaroid camera hunters in the USA:
Also, please note that "less common" doesn't necessarily mean
"low production." For instance-- I don't consider, say, the
Model 110A to be at all uncommon or difficult to find, but at least one
source indicates that there were fewer of them made than the Model 700
(which I consider to be less common than average). How could this
be the case? First of all, the demand for the 110A is far
greater than that for the 700. A given dealer that happens to have
both a 110A and a 700 in his shop is certainly going to give the
110A precedence in terms of shelf space, since in his mind, the
700 is likely to be considered "unsellable." Second-- and
related to the first reason-- is what I sometimes call the
"dumpster effect" or "landfill factor" (no pun
intended). The dealer stuck with a 700 (or 95B or 800 or...) may
well decide he can't sell the thing at all, and toss it in the trash.
The family doing their spring cleaning finds an old Polaroid camera--
nobody wants it, so out in the garbage it goes. [I'd suspect that
a significant percentage of low-end amateur Polaroid cameras made
before the mid-70's are buried in landfills around the world, actually.]
On the other hand, a 110A has at least some value, and the original
owner was more likely an experienced photographer, so it's less likely
that the camera was discarded once it became obsolete or the owner
became disinterested in it.
...Wherever they happen to be, I guess. General amateur-level models can
be found at yard sales, flea markets, thrift stores, and the like.
Your local full-service camera store may have some around. Many professional
Polaroid camera models are still in high demand, so many camera stores
will try to make them available. Want to try mail-order? Pick up a copy
of Shutterbug magazine and peruse the ads-- you'll find a few
old Polaroids hidden here and there. Many large (and small) used camera
dealers have web presenses too. [I don't want to get into recommending
particular dealers, but examples of large dealers I've had good experience
with include Cameta Camera (www.cameta.com), KEH Camera Brokers (www.keh.com),
and Midwest Photo Exchange (www.mpex.com)] There's also the eBay auction
service (www.ebay.com). Happy hunting! More about folding packfilm
cameras can be found in the Pack Camera Questions section of the FAQ.
Many people don't realize it, but Land cameras were
named after the inventor of the instant photography process
used in them. Surprisingly, a lot of people have never heard of
Edwin Land despite the great number-- and variety-- of his inventions
and the extent of the research that he made possible (primarily
in the fields of light and optics, but he's worked in other areas
as well). Edwin Land is
second only to Thomas Edison in the number of patents granted, and
yet comparatively little has been written about him. Those of you
wanting to know more about Land the inventor may be interested in
a new biographical book that (unlike the few other books written
about him) is currently in print and available
at your favorite bookstore. [McElheny, Victor. Insisting on
the Impossible -- The Life of Edwin Land. Perseus Books, 1998.
ISBN 0-7382-0009-3 ] At some point, I'd like to add a page to this
site covering a brief outline about Dr. Edwin Land and the history of Polaroid Corp.
Polaroid transfers and print manipulations are really a bit beyond the
scope of this web site at this point. However, there are already some
fine resources on the web for these topics, so I'll 'cop-out' by providing
some links instead-- see the links page
for these and other Polaroid-related sites.
Image Transfers:
Emulsion Transfers:
Image Manipulations:
Having said that, I will mention that I'm really a cheapskate at
heart, and in fact probably most of the Polaroid film I've ever
bought has been close-dated or out-dated stuff from the bargain bins
at stores or camera swaps. One nice thing about outdated Polaroid
film is that if it's bad, you'll know as soon as you try to use it,
and not days or weeks later when you've finally gotten the film
processed.
Many of you who might be asking this question are probably aware that
conventional film can last a long time after the expiration
date if stored properly. [I've heard of instances of frozen B&W film
still being perfectly good even 10 or 20 years out of date...]
However, in the case of Polaroid film, the processing chemicals are
part of the product itself, and thus should not be frozen.
The refrigerator is ususally a safe place to store Polaroid film, but
do not freeze it.
If stored with any care at all, just about any Polaroid film should still
be perfectly workable up to about a year out of date. After a year
or so, things start to deteriorate depending on the type of film and
how well it has been stored (including the time it spent sitting on the
retail store shelf or warehouse).
The current Polaroid films with the best longevity are probably the
classic B&W peel-apart films, such as Type 667 or Type 57.
You will find, however, that as this film ages, you'll need to
increase the development time drastically (up to about two minutes)
in order to get an acceptable level of contrast. If the film
is too old, though, the developer will fail to spread across the
entire negative/print, and you'll see this manifest as "missing"
areas in the image.
Peel-apart color films (such as Type 669 or Type 59) will show the
same basic failure modes as the B&W film, but since color Polaroid
film is a lot fussier about development time, the problem you'll probably
most likely first notice is a color shift in your prints (usually
towards red).
Integral films (such as SX-70, 600, or Spectra) are a bit different
from the above. As the film ages, the first thing you'll notice is
that the prints don't develop evenly. This gives the prints a sort
of blotchy appearance with uneven color saturation. If the film
is really bad, parts of the image will fail to develop at all,
resulting in solid brown areas in the print. [That brown 'stuff'
is actually the bare film negative.] Once it gets to about
this point, though, the battery built into the film pack may be
too weak to power the camera, thus making the film useless anyway.
Integral film can last a few years out of date if properly stored,
but pay careful attention to the level of color 'blotchiness' as
you use it.
Probably the least "outdate-friendly" Polaroid film (in
my experience anyway) is Polachrome instant slide film. Maybe it's
just me, but it seems like this stuff gets ugly to work with pretty fast
no matter how you store it. I've had Polachrome that worked when further
out of date, but I'd generally avoid Polachrome that's outdated by more
than one year. As with integral film, Polachrome suffers from color
'blotchiness' as it goes out of date, but there's more to it than
that. Frankly, I think Polachrome's rating of 40 ASA is a bit
optimistic as it is, but if you're using outdated Polachrome (even
if only slightly out of date), you may want to try metering it at
25 ASA instead (or even lower if it's more than a year out of date,
and/or try increasing the development time a bit).
Another failure point with Polachrome is that eventually it gets
to the point where the negative (that black coating on the film)
doesn't entirely strip away from the positive during the development
process. If this happens, you can manually strip away the remaining negative
material by soaking the film in warm water and (very!) gently rubbing it
off-- but do this immediately after processing the film! I
haven't played much with Polachrome's B&W cousins (i.e. Polapan
and Polagraph), but they seem to be only slightly better in this
respect.
Sorry-- I'm just a collector of this stuff, and I don't really keep
items in 'stock' for sale. Perhaps someday... but I tend to doubt it'd
be anytime soon. [I think almost everyone fantasizes at turning their hobbies
into a source of income, though... :-) ] If you're looking for parts/service/supplies
related to current Polaroid equipment, please see your local authorized
Polaroid dealer.
On the other hand, I do welcome email from what few other people there
are out there that actually collect old Polaroid cameras, and do
sometimes entertain trades along these lines. [I don't really maintain
a formal 'want list', though.]
For much of their history, Polaroid has had separate camera lines for
their home (North American) market as opposed to the rest of the world.
Sometimes these are actually the same cameras sold under different names
(i.e. Spectra vs. Image cameras), and sometimes they're different cameras
altogether. Note that some North American camera models were also
sold elsewhere, while the converse is not true.
"Special Markets" is what Polaroid evidently calls its line
of cameras designed for non-retail sales-- namely, business
premiums, giveaways, sweepstakes, and the like. [i.e. "Send
in 10 proof-of-purchase seals from Fluffy brand chipped glass and
get a free Polaroid camera!"] While not intended for general retail
sale, apparently some models were used for Polaroid direct end-user
offers. [For instance, I have an old Polaroid flyer describing a
trade-in offer in which owners of 80-series and J33 cameras could
receive a Model 335 automatic pack camera outfit at a greatly reduced
cost plus their old camera in exchange.] Also, I've seen some
indication that Special Markets
cameras were occasionally sold as retail at stores that normally wouldn't be stocking photographic equipment, such as jewelry stores
or gas stations.
This sort of "alternate market" product line isn't/wasn't
unique to Polaroid Corp.-- Kodak has also maintained a similar
distinction in their lines, for instance.
Probably not, if you're planning to have it converted. Most companies
that offer conversion services for Pathfinder cameras-- including
Four Designs (probably the most well-known such company)-- will only
do conversions of 110A/110B/120 cameras, not the original
Model 110. The problem with the original 110 has to do with the physical
location of the rangefinder on that camera. Most conversion procedures
involve cutting off part of the camera body on the side where the back latch is
located. Unfortunately, in the case of the original 110, the rangefinder
would be in the way, and so would be destroyed by the operation.
The 110A/110B/120 rangefinder is located on the opposite side of the
camera, so this isn't an issue with those cameras.
Well, I've got some good news, and I've got some bad news.
The bad news, however, is that it's more difficult than you might think,
and if you screw up at the wrong point, you could turn your Pathfinder body
into a hunk of useless junk. In addition, it appears to be very difficult
to make some of the requesite modifications to the Pathfinder's body using only
common household tools-- access to a metalworking shop would probably be
needed in most people's cases (my attempt shows that even with a heavy-duty
cutting disc, a Dremel tool appears to be insufficient for this purpose).
If you'd still be interested, though (and if the email I receive on this
is any indication, you're certainly not alone!), I've put together some
do-it-yourself instructions and tips-- take a look at the
Converting a Polaroid Rollfilm Camera
how-to page! Do keep in mind though that this project is primarily aimed
at the skilled photo hobbyist who isn't afraid of the risks involved.
Incidently, if your only objection to a professional
conversion is the monetary cost, perhaps it'll make you feel a little
better to know that a good professional conversion will probably look
better than a homebrewed one, and may give you a higher resale value should
you ever decide to sell the camera later. Plus, most conversion
companies include a basic CLA (clean-lube-adjust) on the shutter
as part of the conversion service, and that's certainly worth a few
dollars in and of itself.
Well, that might sound easier, but the reality is that you're
really trading one problem for another, less straightforward, one.
One of the battery contacts in the Wink-Light also serves as a
hidden switch that
shorts the capacitor to the light bulb. This rather clever little safety feature
means that the capacitor will automatically be discharged when you remove
the battery so as to prevent the possibility of electrical shock. The
downside to this is that if you attach/insert a battery that is not the
same physical dimensions of the battery intended for the Wink-Light, you
have to defeat this safety feature in some way-- otherwise,
the battery terminals will also be
connected directly to the light bulb if the Wink-Light is attached to
a camera (thus activating the 'power' switch hidden in the accessory shoe).
By the way, if this happens to you, disconnect the Wink-Light immediately-- otherwise
the bulb will burn out in a matter of seconds!
Sorta. It's a big question that needs a separate web page, though.
Please see the Film Alternatives for Polaroid
Rollfilm Cameras page.
I realize I sorta covered this topic on the page where I describe a
few alternate techniques for taking pictures with rollfilm cameras
(referenced above), but
I still get asked this from time to time.
The answer is that there really isn't any sort of even vaguely regular
source for this sort of thing, and what little that might still turn
up should be approached very cautiously, since this film, even if
stored under ideal conditions, is getting near the end of its useful life.
Keep in mind that the last of this stuff is now at least 8 years out of
date. [Some of you may be aware that conventional B&W film can still
be quite usable a very long time after manufacture if stored properly, but
Polaroid film has an added complication in that the processing chemicals
are part of the product, and are much more perishable than the sensitized
material itself.] By the way, as a reminder-- do not store Polaroid
film in your freezer. Freezing may cause the development chemicals to crystalize and become useless.
Keep your film in the refrigerator instead.
As an extension of this question, I've also been asked by several
people what possibility might exist for Polaroid to resume production
of 40-series rollfilms, to which I reply, "not likely."
...Though I do sometimes wonder aloud if any of the equipment was
still around and-- if the component materials could still be made--
perhaps a single production run of Type 47 or 42 could be done and
the film sold via special order. [If the price per unit and minimum
run were right, I'd even consider doing the distribution myself... :-) ]
Some general tips can be found on the
Using Polaroid Rollfilm Cameras
page. This page is rather incomplete right now, but should help.
You're right-- it's not. Polaroid rollfilm cameras (except the Pathfinders and the J-series electric-eye models) have a single
combined shutter/aperture control which is calibrated in either EV numbers or "Light Value" numbers (a Polaroid-specific
system that predates the standard EV unit system). The
Miscellaneous Data page has a set of
tables to convert these numbers into their corresponding shutter
speeds and apertures.
Not to worry. At one time, the 'negative' roll for Polaroid 40-series
film was packaged on a "coreless" spool. Rather than wind
the film on a separate plastic spool, Polaroid instead crimped the
film trailer into a pair of metal caps, which then served as a spool.
I don't know when Polaroid switched from (and back again to)
a conventional
plastic spool design, but it's rather common to encounter old Polaroid
rollfilm cameras with a pair of old metal endcaps inside that were
left from the last roll of film used in the camera.
In any case, if you find a camera with a pair of metal spool caps
rattling loosely inside, you may as well remove them, since they
can scratch up the paint inside the camera as they rattle around.
I could write a lot on this topic, but here are some quickie answers:
Used models:
Price-wise, it's not too hard to find these sorts of cameras
in the USA for $10 or less, regardless of whether it's a high-end model
(like the 250) or a low-end model (like the 210). Check your local
flea-markets, thrift-stores, and/or garage sales, and you'll probably
turn up a nice one without too much trouble. If you're in more of
a rush, ask at a local camera shop that deals in used equipment-- they
might not have one on display (these cameras don't generally sell that well and
don't bring much money anyway), but perhaps they've got one collecting dust
somewheres that they'd like to find a new home for. Expect to pay
more if you go through a store, but even if you end up spending $25
or more, you're certainly still getting a bargain when you consider
the usefulness of these cameras as photographic instruments.
Also, you may want to try the eBay
(www.ebay.com) auction service.
[NOTE: Outside the USA, these sorts of cameras are apparently less
common and more expensive.]
One catch with any of the 'classic' folding automatic pack cameras,
though, is their oddball battery requirements. See the
Battery Info page for some more information.
As an alternative, you could consider a 'new style' folding automatic
camera such as
The Reporter,
EE100, or the
ProPack.
These are powered by ordinary
'AA' cells, so do not present any problems as far as power is concerned.
However, none of these cameras have a rangefinder (focus is by scale only),
nor are the 'Close-up' or 'Portrait' kits usable with them. Also,
the quality of their plastic lenses is inferior to that of the glass lenses
of the older models. ...And, with the exception of the ProPack, all of
them have flash systems designed for Flashcubes only. Personally, I
greatly prefer the 'classic' folding pack cameras over the 'new-style' ones.
However, in some instances, a ProPack with the ProFlash may prove
to be a very handy and easy-to-use package for many purposes.
Polaroid no longer manufactures or offers new automatic pack cameras;
The last such model (the ProPack)
was discontinued in 2003.
First, unfold the camera by pulling the front out until it 'clicks' into
place. Do the bellows have good, straight accordion-like creases, or do
the bellows look 'mushy' and sag-- as if it has lost its form? If it
looks 'mushy', open the back of the camera (while it's still unfolded)
and check the inside of the bellows. There's a black cloth liner on
the inside of the bellows-- if it has separated from the vinyl outer
layer, then I'd reject the camera right there, because it'll probably
be difficult to repair, and if you don't fix it, the liner will likely
stray into the light path, causing odd shadows in parts of the image.
If the cloth liner has not separated from the outer layer, try
re-folding the camera carefully, and open it again a few times. Someone
might have just been careless in collapsing the camera last time before
it was stored away, and the bellows didn't fold properly. If that's
the case, then you can likely solve the problem just by collapsing the camera
so that the bellows fold neatly, and leave it in its folded state for
a few days so that it can regain its proper shape.
While on the topic of the bellows, check the corners for wear. Don't
despair if you think you see some small cracks or holes-- the aforementioned
cloth liner inside the bellows should keep everything light-tight if
the damage isn't bad. If you want to make certain, take the camera
into a dark place (such as a closet) and run a flashlight along the
creases while looking for points of light on the inside of the
camera. [Alternatively, place a lamp inside the camera and check
the outside of the bellows for light leaks.] Overall, though, my
experience has been that the bellows on these cameras present far
fewer problems than the bellows on most old folding cameras.
Are the metal struts bent or otherwise defective? You may be able to
straigten out bent parts, but replacing struts or sliders may turn into
a very difficult job, since most of these parts are riveted in place.
If the camera has a 'scene selector' switch and a thumbwheel film speed
selector, run both controls through all their combinations (note that
there's a heavy spring action behind the film speed control-- that's
not a defect). In particular, make sure the ASA numbers appear in
the center of the 'window' and that the aperture stops appear centered
in the lens.
Next, check to see if the battery is good and the shutter is functional.
Aim the camera at yourself.
Cock the shutter (push down on the lever marked '3'), then put your
finger (or some other object) over the photocell (the little round
window to the right of the lens). Now press the shutter release
button (marked with the number '2') and hold it down for
about two seconds. If the battery is good, you will hear a single
'click' sound when you press the button, and a second, similar-sounding
'click' when you release the button. If you hear a single 'tungg!' sound
when you press the button and no sound when you let go,
then the battery is dead or the shutter isn't working
(but 99% of the time it's the battery or its associated wiring).
If you hear two separate clicks but the second one occurs before you
let go of the shutter button,
then make sure you're covering the
photocell completely and try again (also, if the camera has a scene
selector, set it to the 'outdoor' position). You should be able to
get the the shutter to stay open for at least a few seconds.
If the shutter
won't stay open that long, then the battery is probably weak.
While you're looking at the lens, take a look and check for scratches
on the top surface and that it's free of fungus or
other deposits on the inside. Small 'cleaning' scratches probably
won't cause very noticable degredation in image quality, but fungus and
haze certainly may.
Check the viewfinder/rangefinder. Is the viewfinder clear? Are the
framelines visible, and do they shift as you focus the camera? If
you have the standard Polaroid finder, move your eye to the 'Focus'
window and check that the double images are there and that you can
line them up by focusing the camera. If you have the Zeiss finder,
is the rangefinder patch clearly visible? Can you bring it into
alignment by focusing the camera? In either case, try focusing on
something about 3.5 to 4 feet (1 meter) away. The bellows should be at about
their maximum extension when the rangefinder says it's in focus.
Now try focusing at something 100 feet or more away (infinity)-- you
should be at the other extreme end of the focus travel when the
rangefinder images are superimposed.
Now open the back of the camera. If there's an empty film pack still
inside, remove it. Check the development rollers-- if they're dirty
and/or covered with developer goo, you can clean them up with some
rubbing alcohol and a lint-free cloth. However, if they're seriously
corroded or rusted, you may have some difficulty getting them back in
shape. I will say I've run into some pretty ugly developer messes that
cleaned up very well with just a few minutes of effort.
Check the rear element of the lens too-- it probably won't
have any scratches, but make a quick check for fungus and haze.
Close the back of the camera, and open the battery compartment (it's the
smaller panel on the back of the camera, except on the 360). You
may very well find some damage from battery leakage there, so be careful.
Cleaning up after a leaky battery mess isn't necessarily difficult, but if the
leakage is serious, you may find that you'll have to replace the
wiring and/or the battery snaps.
NOTE: You can use a similar procedure to check out the rigid
plastic pack cameras and the 'new style' folding cameras, except
that of course there's no rangefinder, and in most cases there
are no framelines in the viewfinder (and the framelines in the
ones that do don't shift when you turn the focus ring).
That should pretty much cover it! Oh, if you've never used one
of these things before, check and see if there's a manual with
the camera. You'll be a lot happier if there is. Trust
me. Speaking of which--
Y'know, I'd love to put up a scanned copy of the Model 100 manual here,
but since that'd be a serious copyright infringement, I don't think
it's likely. However, since a lot of people do seem to run into this
problem, I've thrown together a quick set of instructions that should
help you get started-- please see the
Using Polaroid Pack Cameras page. It's
not really a substitute for a real manual, but I hope you find it
useful. [NOTE: This page is more graphic-intensive than most of
the pages on this site, so please be patient if you have a slow
'net link.]
In addition, I've noticed that Polaroid now has some user
guides available on their web site in PDF format. Most of these
are for current/recent camera models, but there are two which might
be helpful to pack camera owners. One of these is the manual for
the ProPack camera (the last of the folding automatic pack cameras);
you might want to take a look at this if you have a 'new style' folding
pack camera or one of the rigid plastic pack cameras. The other
potentially useful manual is the "Instant Pack Film Guide".
This contains some additional tips regarding tab pulling and development,
but doesn't provide so much help in the way of camera usage. You can
find both of these manuals on Polaroid's
User Guides - Professional and Technical Cameras
page.
Rectangular-format Polaroid pack cameras (which include all folding models
and most of the rigid plastic models) can use
100-series and
660/670-series pack films. However, the
100-series film line has all but disappeared at this point, having been
long-since supplanted/replaced by members of the 660-series 'professional' film line.
...This isn't really a bad thing, however, as the 660-series films are potentially
higher in quality and are similar in price.
The current 660-series films most equivalent to the old (B&W) Type 107 and
(color) Type 108 films are, respectively, Type 667 and Type 669.
These two films
are very good
all-around choices for general-purpose photography with old Polaroid pack
cameras. These two are also about the easiest to find Polaroid pack films these
days-- you should be able to find at least Type 667 and 669 in stock at any
full-service camera store [NOTE: "Wal-Mart" and "K-Mart"
do not qualify as "full-service camera stores" :-) I have
noticed, however, that some Ritz Camera locations (as found in many
shopping malls) do carry these two films.]
If you're rediscovering Polaroid pack film after having only used it in
the 1960's and 70's, you'll notice that Type 667 isn't exactly the same as
the old Type 107. For one thing, 667 is coaterless, which means you
don't have to deal with those sticky (and smelly) coater swabs. On
the other hand, like all the coaterless B&W films, Type 667 requires a
longer development time (30 seconds versus 15 seconds for Type 107).
Also, Type 667 prints have a slightly siffer, grey plastic-like base,
whereas Type 107 prints are fiber-based and look more like traditional
photographic paper. [By the way, these comments about Type 667 also
apply to its former brandmate, Type 107C.] Also, whereas the old
Type 107 and 108 films came 8 exposures to a pack, most of the current
Polaroid pack films are now packaged as 10 exposures to a pack.
Of course, these three aren't the only film types you can use in your
camera. If you enjoy doing B&W darkroom work, you might want to
try Type 665 -- in addition to a positive print, this film also produces
a reusable negative for making further prints/enlargements with traditional
photographic processes. [NOTE: You will need sodium sulfite (available
at camera stores that stock a better-than-average variety of darkroom chemistry)
to 'clear' the negatives produced by this film. ...However, if you
really get in a pinch, it is possible to do this with plain water, but doesn't
work very well.] Keep in mind that Type 665 has a speed of only 75 (80) ASA,
so set your camera to either '75' or 'COLOR' rather than the usual 'B&W'
setting. If you're looking for a better color film than Type 669,
try the new Type 690 film.
[This film, however, is slightly faster than Type 669,
so try setting the L/D control on your camera one small mark towards Darken
when using 690 film.]
Oh, one other thing: Most of the film types which used to be labeled
as having a film speed of 75 now say 80 instead. I'm not sure whether
or not the actual speed rating of the film changed, or if Polaroid
just chose the new number as being a better geometric 'fit' between
the standard speeds of 50 and 100 and left the film as-is.
[ASA 80 is 1/3 stop slower than ASA 100. Likewise, 64 is 1/3 stop faster
than 50. Despite being exactly between 50 and 100 on a linear scale,
ASA 75 is not exactly between ASA 50 and 100-- ASA film speeds are
on a geometric scale.]
In any case, it really doesn't matter from a practical
standpoint-- you can use film rated as 80 with your camera's normal
setting of 75 and vice-versa.
If you have a 'square'-format pack camera (in the USA, this pretty much
means only those models with the word "Square" or "Zip"
in their names), you might be interested to know that Polaroid recently
(Fall 2003) revitalized their line of
80-series films, so now you should
have an easier time obtaining film for your camera (as well as have
some additional choices not available previously).
Here's a quick outline of accessories you may encounter along with
some general opinions. Note that your particular intended use of
the camera will certainly affect which accessories would have
interest to you. Your opinions may vary as well.
Check the battery page for a few alternatives,
but if you need an original 531 or 532 battery, there are a
few sources. For one thing, Polaroid Customer Service offers
them directly for about $7 apiece. Also, it appears that
Radio Shack has resumed listing the 531 as a special order item.
The No. 531 cross-references to a PX-19, and is available as
Radio Shack Cat. #960-0378 (price: $8.99). Unfortunately, I
can't find an exact replacement for the No. 532 in the Radio
Shack catalog or web site. In addition, a visitor to this site
has suggested www.photobattery.com
as a source for both of these battery types. I see that they also
have a number of other hard-to-find battery types of interest to
vintage camera owners. [Note: I have no personal experience with
photobattery.com as a customer, so this should not be taken as an
endorsement of their products and/or services.]
Fortunately, these batteries last quite a long time.
In a 'classic' folding pack camera, the only thing the battery powers is the
shutter electromagnet and its associated timing/metering circuit.
So, unless you make a lot of long (i.e. over 1 second) exposures
or go through dozens of packs of film a month, you'll probably find that
the battery will last for years. In fact, with only light
to moderate camera use, the battery will probably last about as long as its
shelf-life. [Note: The two 'AA' cells used in the 'new-style' folding
pack cameras and in the non-folding models also provide power for the
Flashcube socket, so the batteries in those cameras will run down more
quickly if you use a lot of Flashcubes.]
Those would include the
Model 180,
Model 195, and
Model 190 cameras. However, as
mentioned in the 'general' section of the FAQ, these are considerably
more expensive these days than the more common mass-market automatic
cameras. In addition, there's the recently-discontinued
600SE and
even a few cameras that were made by other companies (most notably
the Konica Instant Press). You might also consider a converted 110A/B
Pathfinder (as mentioned in the rollfilm section of the FAQ). However,
do keep in mind that any of these choices will probably run you at least
a couple of hundred dollars (the converted Pathfinders being about the least
expensive of the group).
However, there are at least two other alternatives that might be
somewhat lower in cost. One would be to modify the shutter timing circuit
of an automatic pack camera to provide a selection of pre-set fixed
shutter speeds (I've experimented with this a bit and know how it can be
done, but now I need to hack up something to time the shutter so I
can calibrate it properly). If convenience isn't
a particular factor, another possibility would be to purchase an old 4x5
press camera (i.e. a Speed Graphic) and a suitable Polaroid back. However,
the value of old press cameras appears to have increased significantly
in the past few years, so this might not currently represent a great savings for
the person primarily interested in Polaroid photography. The other
thing is that the Polaroid #405 film holder (which uses ordinary 100/660-series
pack films) requires a 4x5 camera with a Graflok-style back. The
more common (and generally less-expensive) earlier press cameras with simple
spring backs will only work with 50-series 4x5 Polaroid sheet film
(in a #500, #545, or #545i holder). Of course, with the press camera,
you'd have the advantage of also being able to use it with conventional
4x5 sheet film as the camera was intended. Oh, and if you don't mind
spending (typically) significantly more money, you could even get an old 4x5 Graflex,
and thus be able to have a single-lens-reflex capable of using the entire image
area of Polaroid peel-apart films. :-)
You can try your local full-service camera store for flashbulbs, but
keep in mind that M3's (like most flashbulbs) don't seem to be currently
in production. However, that doesn't mean they're impossible to find--
old family-run drugstores and grocery stores sometimes still have these
things on their shelves, and don't forget the local flea markets/garage
sales/thrift stores-- that otherwise uninteresting $1 plastic Brownie Hawkeye
sitting on the table there might have a few boxes of flashbulbs with it!
Flashbulbs don't go 'bad' from old age, so don't worry about when the
bulbs might have been made. On the other hand, I would avoid bulbs
that look like they're banged-up or scratched-- if the coating is
damaged, these bulbs can shatter when fired! [All Polaroid
flashguns for individual bulbs have a built-in flash shield to help
protect you and your subject from possible injury if this should happen,
though.] As for substitute bulbs, the instruction manual recommends against
using M3B's (blue-coated M3's) in the #268 flashgun (since the #268's
flash shield already acts as a blue color-correcting filter), but in
reality, you
may as well use 'em if that's what's available. You might have to set the L/D
control a mark or so towards Lighten, however.
M5 and M5B bulbs (but not the more common larger base #5 and #5B) should
also work well too (with M5B's bearing a similar note to M3B's).
M2 and M2B bulbs will fit in the #268 flashgun just fine, but these
produce significantly less light than M3 or M5 bulbs, so if you must
use them, try only using them for close-distance shots, or perhaps
try setting the L/D control all the way towards Lighten.
Pretty much the same comments regarding the availability of M3 flashbulbs
also applies to Flashcubes. In particular, Hi-Power Flashcubes are
sometimes a bit tricky to find, since not a lot of other cameras were
designed for them. If your flash/camera is supposed to use Hi-Power cubes
only ("Focused Flash" models), you can probably use regular
Flashcubes but you may have to set the L/D control (on the flash, if possible)
towards Lighten. This will also limit your usable flash range, by the
way. [You may also have to trim the little 'ears' on the base of
the cubes slightly to get them to fit, as this was an "unsupported
configuration," as it were.]
On the other hand, you can almost certainly use Hi-Power Flashcubes in pack cameras designed
for regular Flashcubes, and you can use this as a way to extend the maximum
flash distance on these cameras. [No modification should be necessary
to get the Hi-Power cubes to fit]
The only Polaroid camera designed for Magicubes is the
Big Shot. You
cannot substitute Magicubes for Flashcubes or vice-versa, as
they operate on entirely different principles, and won't fit anyway.
If you happen across some loose flashcubes without their box, it's certainly
possible that you could get confused if you haven't seen them before.
An illustration follows, but here's a quick rundown:
regular Flashcubes: These have visible wire contacts on the base, and the
base is usually either blue or yellow in color, but may be black
or other colors. These will usually be labeled with the word
"Flashcube" on the top. These were made by many
different manufacturers.
Here's a picture illustrating various types of Flashcubes and flashbulbs. [JPEG, 54k]
Given that about the only Polaroid cameras that still have a film supply
and use only these size flashbulbs are the
Big Swinger (3000) and the
Zip,
this question is almost academic at this point. But just for
completeness sake, I'll mention that while you can't easily substitute
other flashbulb types for AG-1's, they are close kin to the individual
flashbulbs used in Flashcubes. So, if you're really desperate,
you could take apart a Flashcube, remove the 4 individual bulbs inside,
and carefully bend the wires to make proper connection in the camera's
flashgun. ...But it still wouldn't work very well, because the physical
dimensions still won't be quite right, and most Flashcubes have blue-coated
bulbs and won't produce quite as much light as a real AG-1.
I guess it's easy to forget just how ubiquitous electronic flashes are
these days, and how there is an increasing number of photographers out there who have never
used a flashbulb or Flashcube or even a flash 'array' (such as a Flashbar or FlipFlash).
Flashbulbs may look a lot like ordinary incandecent light bulbs, but the
filament is designed with very different goals and so is very different
in chemical makeup. Flashbulbs are
single-use affairs-- once you ignite it, the filament is vaporized and
destroyed. These things can really pack an enormous light intensity for
their size and power requirements (not to mention consistent over a very wide
range of ignition voltages), but the trade-off is that they work only
once, and that's it. No wonder electronic flashes became so popular
once the price and size factors came down...
Yes indeed. The dot is actually a chemical indicator painted
inside the bulb. Normally, this dot should appear blue in color, but
turns pink when exposed to oxygen. Therefore, a pink dot indicates
that the bulb is cracked or damaged. Never try to use a bulb with a
pink dot! It will not only perform poorly, but will have an increased
likelihood of shattering when ignited.
Sylvania was an early pioneer of these indicators, but
eventually most other flashbulb manufacturers started adding this
feature to their products as well. This is the origin of the
well-known "Blue Dots For Sure Shots" slogan that appears
on practically every old Sylvania flashbulb advertisement or box.
I'm not sure what the true root cause is, but I've known of several folding
pack cameras with this symptom. Perhaps a precision capacitor
in the timing circuit has a tendency to get out of spec.
[I'll have to investigate it at some point; I'll put together a
'HowTo' page for repairing it if/when I do.]
In any case, you can (usually)
just find the setting of the L/D control where your prints turn
out correctly exposed, and leave it there (you may want to mark the
new 'normal' postion on the dial). Also, if you really want to get adventurous
and are electromechanically inclined, there are two trimpots in the shutter
timing circuit you can play with, but take care that you can restore
things back to their original state if you tinker around with these.
[I haven't played with adjusting these, but I do wonder how they may
affect the response curve of the metering system.]
By the way, the 100-series and 200-series cameras seem to be the most
suseptible
to this problem; I don't know if this is simply because they've
been around longer, or if there was a design/component change in the
later cameras.
Yes, as a matter of fact, you can. The two most important components
to the Close-Up and Portrait kits are (a) the close-up lens itself,
and (b) the parallax/distance-compensating 'goggles' for the
camera's rangefinder/viewfinder. The 180, 190, and 195 all share
similar range/viewfinder components with several of the regular
Automatic models, so all you need is a Close-Up/Portrait kit
designed for any Polaroid camera having the same finder type as yours.
The close-up lenses used in these kits are of commonly available
diopter strengths. The lenses are +1 for the Portrait Kits, and +3
for the Close-Up Kits. Any screw-in filter of the proper strength
(and that will fit your camera) can be substituted for the one in the
Kit. Details can be found on the
HowTo: 180/195 Close-Up Kit Substitutes
page.
Yes and no. Polaroid never offered such an accessory, but there were
a few third-party supplementary tele/wide lens sets sold under
various importer names such as Kalimar/Kaligar or GoldCrest.
While I may not
have actual experience with whatever specific lens set you might
run into, I must point out that these types of
supplementary lens attachments in general -- and especially inexpensive 'generic'-branded
ones like these -- are usually (a) poor in quality, (b) provide only
a modest tele/wide effect and (c) are relatively inconvenient to use.
In particular, such telephoto lens attachments are often of
questionable value, since the modest magnification of the image may
be more than offset by the reduction in resolution caused by
poor quality supplementary lenses. The wide-angle lens attachments may
be a bit more useful, since there are occasions when even the
limited reduction of such a supplementary lens could mean the
difference between getting the picture you want and not
getting it. Even so, you would probably be better off
changing your position or re-composing the picture if possible.
This is a common misconception and is false. While Zeiss never supplied
lenses for a Polaroid camera, they did produce the view/rangefinder assembly
found on a few models (i.e. the 250, 350, 360, 450 and 180), and this
is probably how the confusion came about. [Personally, I tend to feel
that getting Zeiss to supply the view/rangefinder for certain high-end
models was really as much of a marketing point than anything else, but...]
[NOTE: I have been informed that I am holding the camera in the 'wrong' hand
in the instructions/illustration below. Well, they're right. I'm left-handed, you see. :-)
Therefore, those of you in the 'right' may wish to reverse the handed-ness of
these instructions. ...But it doesn't matter anyway; you'll still be able to
open the camera just fine.]
First, hold the folded SX-70 camera in your right hand so that the bulge (which
becomes the top panel of the viewfinder) is on the top and pointing away from
you. Using the thumb and index finger of your left hand, grip the viewfinder
top panel near the end closest to the center of the camera, and lift
upward. [See the two hinge pins on the sides of the viewfinder top
panel? Put your thumb and index finger on or near those two pins.]
While holding the bottom of the camera firmly in your right hand, continue
lifting upward with your left hand until you hear the side strut click
into place.
Many people, when first encountering a folding SX-70, try to pull up on the
front of the viewfinder panel near the Flashbar slot-- this not only won't
work, but you could damage the camera if you put too much pressure on that
side of the panel.
Better yet, view this illustration demonstrating how to unfold an SX-70.
There are a couple of different ways to hold the SX-70. Here's what I call
the "hamburger" grip: Hold the camera with both
hands so that your thumbs are at the bottom of the camera, and your
fingers wrap around the 'arch' at the top of the camera. Think of
holding it like a hamburger, and you'll have the basic idea. The middle
finger of your right hand should fall fairly naturally on the focus
wheel. Make sure your fingers do not rest on the bellows of
the camera-- pressure on the bellows could cause the mirror to get
stuck in the middle of its travel.
First, check for obvious physical damage:
Folding SX-70 cameras often show signs of physical mishandling, usually caused
by misguided attempts at unfolding the camera. This is especially true
at thrift stores and other such venues, where shoppers (or store staff)
unfamiliar with
SX-70 cameras may inadvertently damage the camera in some attempt to
determine just what that funny-looking leather-covered rectangular thing is.
Another (but seemingly less common) problem is damage caused by dropping
the camera while in its unfolded state.
If you first encounter the camera in its folded state, there are three
tell-tale signs of mishandling damage that you should look for before
you try to unfold the camera. Some of these are minor, but others can
indicate more serious issues:
If you noticed signs of "droopy front syndrome" during your
original preliminary inspection of the camera, then check the
front again while unfolding the camera. If the droop doesn't get any worse
when you unfold the camera, then the camera is probably still okay to use
(though you probably won't be able to fix the problem either).
However, if the film door falls open when you unfold the camera and won't
stay closed when you try to close it again, then you should probably
reject the camera. What probably happened is that someone unfamiliar
with the camera tried pulling the camera apart at the front to open it
and in doing so broke the latch arm on the film door. :-/ This is very
difficult to repair unless you happen to be able to recover the end
of the latch that broke off so you can epoxy it back together, and
even then it could be iffy.
[It appears that Polaroid made some minor modifications to the design
of the latch with the Alpha and Sonar models which may or may not have
helped prevent this problem.]
If the camera unfolds easily, but resists being folded again or won't
stay folded, don't force it! Unfold the camera again and look through
the viewfinder before investigating
further. If the finder is completely dark (no image visible), the
camera's "flip" mirror may be stuck in
its upward position. [NOTE: The optics for the reflex viewing system
in the SX-70 creates an "arial" image rather than a reflected
one. One consequence of this is that the finder has a narrower angle
of view than most reflex camera viewfinders, so make sure you are looking
directly through the viewfinder eyepiece.]
A 'dark' finder can also be caused by the shutter
being closed, which may or may not accompany the mirror problem. In
either case, if there is no image visible in the viewfinder, then this
probably indicates that the camera jammed (probably due to a weak battery
in the film pack) the last time it was used, and the owner put the
camera away without trying to fix it. If this is the case, you
should try to fix the jam before attempting to fold the camera again.
Otherwise, you risk breaking the camera's mirror mechanism-- assuming
it isn't already broken. [See FAQ question 4.5]
If the camera doesn't want to close all the way, but the finder appears
normal, then the mirror isn't the problem. Try folding the camera
again slowly and see if you can determine what is
causing the camera to 'bind'. If the metal strut on the side
of the camera has bent or fallen out of its normal track, it may
"drag" against part of the camera body.
Also keep an eye out for cracks/splits in
the camera body, especially near the hinges. Remember that the main
body parts of of all SX-70 cameras are made of plastic-- even on
the chrome-plated SX-70 models. [Cracks near the hinges
tend to suggest that the camera was dropped while unfolded.]
If the camera easily closes
almost all the way
but then gets stuck, check the following-- there's a crecent-shaped
plastic shim on one side of the film door hinge; sometimes this
shim pops out of its normal place and rotates.
[Another (but less likely) possibility is
that the camera had been left in its unfolded position for a very
extended period of time-- I have a Sonar SX-70 that spent most of
its life attached to a microscope adapter, and now (after removing
the adapter) it just doesn't
want to stay folded even though there's no apparent physical damage.]
Functional check:
With the camera unfolded, look through the viewfinder and try adjusting
the focus, making sure you can focus the camera properly at objects at
various distances away. [If this is a Sonar camera, put it in manual
focus mode by pushing the little tab just above the focus wheel.]
The camera should focus smoothly as you rotate the wheel without
binding or sticking. If the focus 'binds' slightly at one or two
particular points on the wheel, that's probably okay, and slight
binding at certain points is in fact quite normal due to the mechanism's
design. However, if the focus is stiff or has a constant
rough, grinding feel, then something is wrong.
For the rest of these tests you will need a SX-70 or 600 film pack with
a good battery. Use an old, empty, film pack so you don't
waste film
during this quick check-- the only important criteria is that the
pack's built-in battery must still be good.
It would be a nice idea
to insert an old SX-70/600 cover sheet (or an unwanted SX-70 or 600 photo)
into the film pack
first so that you can verify the action of the eject motor/gear train/
development roller mechanism, but
that's rarely a problem with these cameras anyway. Also: remember that if
you use a 600 film pack for this test, you will probably have to cut off the
little tabs on the bottom of the pack first to get it to fit in
the camera. If you don't have a film pack with you and you're at a thrift
store, chances are good that there's an old OneStep or Pronto! or
some other Polaroid camera somewhere nearby that uses SX-70 or 600 film,
so look for empty film packs inside those too.
Okay, assuming you have a film pack available, push the film door relase
latch, insert the film pack, and close the film door. Within one second
or so of closing the film door, you should hear the whirrrrring of
the eject motor (and see the cover sheet/film eject if the pack isn't
empty). If nothing happens, then the battery in the film pack is
probably dead, so find another one if possible.
Next, if this is a Sonar model SX-70, check the autofocus mechanism.
[Make sure the camera is not in manual focus mode; folding
the camera will automatically reset the selector to AF mode.]
Look through the finder and lightly touch the shutter button as you
aim the camera at various things. You should hear a quick *wrrp!* sound
when you lightly press of the button as the lens focuses, and another
*wrrp!* as the lens focus returns to infinity when you release
your finger from the button. If the you can tell the lens motor is
working, but the camera always focuses to the same distance no matter
where you aim the camera, then there's something wrong with the Sonar
module. [Don't forget that Sonar AF does not respond through
glass, so don't try to test infinity focus by pointing the
camera at a window.] Sonar SX-70 cameras also have a low-light
warning indicator not present in the 'regular' models-- a red
light to the right of the viewfinder will appear when the light
is low as a suggestion to use a flash if possible.
Finally, check to see if the mirror and shutter mechanisms (and the shutter
timing circuit) are operational. Now, while I generally suggest
covering the CdS metering cell when testing the shutter/battery on folding
pack cameras, I don't recommend doing this when making quick
check-tests on SX-70 cameras. Why? The main reason is that unlike
the pack cameras, there is no way to 'abort' a long exposure on a
folding SX-70 camera (other than removing the film pack and re-installing
it). If you cover the meter cell completely and
push the shutter button on an SX-70 camera, you might be sitting
there waiting for up to a minute, not knowing if the shutter is still
'timing' normally, or if the battery is dying, or the camera is broken,
or what. The other issue
is that while an intentional long exposure on an automatic pack camera
provides a useful battery test, that's not an important issue on an SX-70
camera since you get a new battery with every film pack anyway. So,
for SX-70 cameras, if you're indoors, try aiming the camera at an overhead
light or towards a window just to help ensure that the resulting
exposure will be under 1 second. Don't use a Flashbar (or electronic
flash attachment) for this initial
test. Just push the button and watch and listen. You may not be able
to detect all of these things happening (the shutter is very quiet in
these cameras and may not be audiable), but here is the sequence of
events that should occur: (1) The shutter closes. (2) The mirror flips
upward (making a solid *fwup!* sound). (3) The shutter opens
for the
length of time determined by the autoexposure system. (4) The shutter
closes. (5) The film eject motor starts (with a long *wrrrrrrrrrr*
sound). (6) The mirror flips back down and the shutter opens again,
restoring the image in the viewfinder (*ting!*).
As of mid-2000, it appears that Polaroid has started offering some
user guides available on their web site in PDF format. Most of these
are for current/recent camera models, but they do have two abbreviated
'quick reference guides' which you might find useful. They aren't as
detailed as the original manuals for these cameras, would certainly be
better than nothing. One of these is for folding SX-70 cameras, and
the other one is for Pronto!, OneStep, and other non-folding SX-70 cameras.
You can find both of these manuals on Polaroid's
User Guides - Handheld Cameras
page.
Usually this happens when the battery in the film pack gets weak, and
thus causes one of the motors in the camera to get stuck in the middle
of its cycle. If this is the case, you can usually fix it by merely
removing the film pack and replacing it with a fresh one (or an empty
(used) pack that still has a good battery). The cycle should complete
where it left off and return the camera to its 'normal' state. In
some instances, you may have to remove and insert the 'good' film pack
a few times before the camera fully resets itself.
There were many third-party flashes made for these cameras in addition
to the one Polaroid offered (*), but I'll admit that they're not always
easy to find these days, and often expensive. If you're having problems
finding one, here are a few alternate suggestions: (a) Get an electronic
flash designed for the non-folding plastic SX-70 cameras (these clip-on
flashes are inexpensive and easier to find), and make a bracket to attach
it to your folding SX-70 as well as an extension cable to connect it to
the Flashbar socket. (b) Make your own adapter to trigger a conventional
electronic flash from the Flashbar socket (detailed instructions on how
to do this can be found at Georg Holderied's
The Hacker's Guide to the SX-70).
(*) NOTE! While almost all third-party SX-70-compatible
electronic flash units will work with any folding SX-70 camera,
the Polaroid Polatronic #2350 flash will ONLY work with SX-70 Sonar
cameras (and Pronto! Sonar cameras), and NOT the original SX-70 or
SX-70 Alpha cameras. If anyone knows of a way to adapt the #2350
flash for use with non-Sonar cameras, let me know.
Here's another question that's answered in detail on Georg Holderied's
Hacker's Guide to the SX-70 page,
so I won't cover the whole thing here.
The simplest (and most easily reversable) way to alter the SX-70 exposure
system is via an entirely optical approach-- if you set the lighten/darken
control all the way towards 'darken' and remove the little
round 'window' from in front of the CdS cell (the round bezel pops out
fairly easily, but be careful as it wouldn't be too difficult
to break it), this will give you just about the two stops of
exposure difference that you'll need to use 600 film. This solution
is admittedly a bit of a kludge, however.
A more elaborate/permanent solution would of course be an electronic
modification. Unfortunately, there are no built-in adjustments
(i.e. trimpots) available on the SX-70's timing circuit, but you will
find a solution on Georg's site (found with some trial-and-error).
Note that this modification requires some basic electronic expertise as
well as soldering skills.
Oh, one thing-- while 600 film cartridges are the same physical size
as SX-70 cartridges, there are four little tabs on the bottom of the
600 cartridge that are designed to prevent you from accidently inserting
it in an SX-70 camera. You can cut the tabs off with a hobby knife,
but Georg's site offers another solution as well. Also, on some
SX-70 cameras, you can insert a 600 cartridge fairly easily just by
inserting it at a steep angle.
No.
The #500 was the original Polaroid 4x5 film holder, and was subsequently
replaced by the #545 (and later, the #545i). The design of Polaroid
4x5 sheet film was changed slightly with the newer holders, however,
and this results in a minor compatibility issue with the #500
holder. Here's the deal: 4x5 Polaroid sheet film is packaged in
opaque 'envelopes'. One side of the envelope contains the positive paper
for the print, and it doubles as a 'dark slide' for the negative. When
you load a sheet, a metal finger in the holder grabs the negative so
that it stays in the holder when you pull the envelope (now serving as a
dark slide) out to allow the negative to be exposed (with the lever remaining in the "Load" position). A simple stop
mechanism is supposed to prevent you from pulling the envelope all the
way out of the holder-- only enough to allow the negative to be exposed.
When using the original #500 holder with modern 4x5 Polaroid film, however,
the auto stop mechanism won't engage, and you'll be able to pull the entire envelope
out of the holder (and lots of luck getting the envelope back in the
holder correctly so that the negative will once again be inside).
However, this doesn't mean you can't still use the #500 holder-- you just
have to be careful not to pull the envelope out too far when exposing
the film. You can
measure the proper distance to pull the envelope by remembering that
the idea is to pull it out enough to expose the negative (the length
of the opening in the holder) and no further. A used
envelope can be marked to use as a template to help you remember the
correct distance to pull the envelope (dark slide). [Tip for 4x5 users
on a budget: Old #500 holders are often considerably less expensive
than the newer models. If you don't mind having to take the little
extra care when using it, a #500 can still serve nicely. I have one,
and it works just fine.]
Here, in a nutshell, is a quick set of instructions that should work
with any of the single-sheet Polaroid film holders:
[As an aside, I'm surprised how many times I've been asked this sort of
question-- perhaps there are more Polavision owners out there than I thought... :-) ]
Your options here depend in part on whether or not you still have (or have
access to) a functioning Polavision Player.
If you have a working Polavision Player and don't require absolutely top-notch
quality, you're almost home free-- all you need is a video camera or
camcorder (if you don't own a video camera and can't borrow one from
somebody, you might check your local public library). In fact, it's actually
easier to transfer Polavision to videotape this way than it is to transfer
conventional home movies yourself, because the Polavision Player already has a
rear-projection screen. Plus, the Player is already optically aligned
for that screen. All you have to do is set the video camera on a tripod
and aimed so that it is exactly "square" with the Player screen (the
camera lens axis goes through the exact center of the Player screen and
is exactly perpendicular to the plane of the screen). Keep in mind that
the Player screen is tilted slightly upwards. If your video camera / camcorder
offers a choice of 'shutter speeds', you may wish to choose one around
1/15 second. Doing so may cause the motion of fast-moving objects to seem
slightly "jumpy," but will greatly reduce the potential
flicker in the resulting video. Also, be sure that the room is as dark
as possible when you do this in order to reduce reflections/glare on the
screen and maximize contrast.
If you don't have a working Polavision Player things are going to get
more complicated. [if all you need is a new bulb, it should still be
possible to get one; I'll see if I can look up a source] The
good
news is that the film format used in Polavision Phototapes is
identical to conventional Super 8 movie film, so it should
be perfectly
compatible with Super 8 projectors and the telecine equipment used by film
transfer services. The bad news is that
you'll have to get the film onto
standard Super 8 film reels, and that means you'll have to get the
film out of the Phototape cassettes first. Once you remove the film
from the cassette, you probably won't be able to put it back in, so
this is pretty much going to be irreversible. If you have your film
professionally transferred, the transfer service may offer to handle
the film removal/splicing for you; they might not be familiar with
Polavision specifically, but they'll probably understand the basic concept
of what you need and how to do it correctly. [If you're looking for a film
transfer service, ask at your local full-service camera dealer. They
may offer such services or be able to refer you to a reputable company.]
If you're planning to do the transfer yourself (i.e. using a Super 8 projector
and rear-projection screen plus a video camera), keep in mind that you want
to use a pretty small projected image if possible in order to maximize the
brightness of the image for aiming your video camera. I haven't had
much experience
with Polavision film, but I must say that Polachrome (which is based on
the basic Polavision technology) is considerably 'denser' than conventional
transparency film, and so doesn't transmit as much light (in other words,
appears darker). This, by the way, is one of the reasons why
Polaroid decided to go with the small-screen self-contained 'box' projector
for Polavision in the first place.
NOTE: If you are in the film transfer business and have handled
Polavision film transfers in the past, let me know, and I'll maintain
it on a list for those who request. Some of the above information
has been recently verified/provided by one such person, so now I at
least have one contact for these types of services.
One extra caevat: Do not be surprised if your old Polavision movies
appear to have random translucent 'blotches' that look like water
spots. I don't know the cause, but, unfortunately, this appears
to be a very common deterioration symptom of Polavision film.
Unlike some water-spotting defects, these marks cannot simply be cleaned off
the film. If someone knows more about this problem (and/or a possible
solution), let me know. By the way, I have not seen this
'spotting' problem
with any of my Polachrome slides, so I don't know if this
"failure mode" is exclusive to Polavision, or if it's
simply that my Polachrome slides aren't yet old enough to exhibit
the symptom. [Some of these were taken over 15 years ago, however,
and were not stored with any special care.]
"Polaroid", "Land Camera" and other camera
names are trademarks of Polaroid Corporation. No endorsement
or approval by Polaroid Corporation is implied, nor is Polaroid
responsible for the accuracy of the content of this web site.
Remember, any damage caused to your camera or self or whatever from
following tips on this web site are your own responsibility. Safety first!
Contents Copyright © 1992-2004 by Martin (Marty) Kuhn /
mkuhn@rwhirled.com
Land List Legal / Privacy Info
1.1: I just bought an old Polaroid camera at a garage sale. Can I still
get film for it?
1.2: What kind of battery does my Polaroid camera need? Does it need a battery at all?
1.3: I found an old Polaroid camera in the attic! Is it a valuable
collector's item? How much is it worth?
The prices given above are vague
approximations based on general observation, and are given in US
dollars. These figures are not to be taken as 'official' appraisals
or the like. Your mileage may (and will) vary.
Of the remaining mass-market models not listed above, just about any
of them (aside from international models) should be obtainable in the USA
for about ten dollars or less, though you will certainly see much higher price tags
on occasion. Sometimes this is due to business overhead-- i.e. you're
probably going to pay more for a used folding pack Polaroid at a camera
store than at a garage sale. After all, the camera store owner not only
has rent and salaries to pay for, but also may offer a gurantee and/or other
value-added services to your used camera purchase-- depending on your
situation, this may be well worth the extra cost. A lot of times, though,
this is due to general ignorance about the market-- I don't know how many
times I've seen people try to get $50 or more for, say, a Polaroid
Swinger 20
(perhaps the most plentiful camera in the world, and worth,
according to McKeown's Guide to Antique and Classic Cameras,
"$5 per truckload, delivered").
1.3a: But I don't think you answered my question! I want to know exactly
what my Polaroid Model 150 (or Swinger, or 80A, etc.) is worth! I even have the
flash and the original leather case with it!
Just as a bit of an experiment, I generated some statistics by performing
some quick searches on completed auctions on eBay of specific commonly found
Polaroid camera models. Following is a summary of some of these results:
1.4: OK, so my Polaroid camera collection isn't worth much. Which
ones are the easiest (or most difficult) to find? Are any of them
really rare?
Anything else is what I'd consider to be roughly in the
"average" range in terms of difficulty (unless I'm forgetting
something that ought to be in one of the other categories, of course...).
1.5: Where can I find old Polaroid cameras in general?
1.6: Why are they called "Land" cameras anyway? Did people
think they were supposed to be underwater cameras or something?
1.7: What are these "image transfers," "emulsion transfers,"
and "print manipulations" that I sometimes hear about people
doing with Polaroid film? How can I do them?
This is a technique performed with color Polaroid peel-apart pack films
(and I suppose 4x5 films) only. The basic idea is to replace the Polaroid
print paper (the "receiving sheet") with something else. A really
easy way to try this out is to take a picture in the usual way, but after
you pull the yellow tab (to start picture development), immediately peel
away the print and (quickly!) lay the 'negative' side against a sheet
of plain paper (ordinary watercolor art paper is good). Firmly
(and continuously) roll a wooden dowel or a brayer or something similar
over the negative to squeeze the two surfaces together. After
the development time, peel away the negative, and you should see
a rather pastel-looking color image on the paper! The texture and
color rendition of the image will depend on a number of factors
including the type of paper used and any preperation done to it
beforehand. Anyway, it's easy and fun to do, and it seems to be a
particularly good way to use outdated color film that has become
deficient for normal use. Remember-- this is for color
films only.
This is also for peel-apart films only (color or B&W), but in this case,
the picture is processed normally, and then the emulsion itself is
'melted' off the print and transferred to another surface. This
is a bit more complicated, so I'm not going to cover the technique here.
This is a technique for SX-70 Time-Zero film. The basic
idea is very simple-- take a picture, and while it is
developing, take your fingernail or a stick or a screwdriver-- anything!--
and rub against the print. Depending on the bluntness of the tool and
the pressure used, you can alter the image in a variety of ways.
This doesn't work well with 600, Spectra, or the other integral print
films-- just SX-70.
1.8: I'd like to take more instant photos, but I'm really on a budget.
I sometimes buy outdated conventional film to save money, but how well does
Polaroid film 'keep' after the expiration date?
First of all, I suppose I should note that expired film is not guaranteed
in any way by Polaroid Corp, and should always be considered an
"AS-IS" "where-is" purchase. In addition,
there are so many variables involved in whether or not you'll get
acceptable results with outdated film that there's no assurance
that you'll have good luck even if you follow these guidelines.
Your mileage may vary. Of course, if the project you have in
mind requires any level of quality or consistency, then you should
really be using fresh film and not taking chances with the outdated
stuff in the first place.
1.9: Can I determine the exact date of manufacture or any other information
about my camera from the serial number?
Check out the
Serial Number Info
FAQ page for what little information I have about serial
number patterns at this point.
1.10: I just found an old Polaroid camera, but it's really grimy
looking. How can I clean it up so that it looks better?
1.10: Miscellaneous General Questions:
1.10.1: Are you a dealer? Do you have any Polaroid cameras/parts/accessories
for sale?
1.10.2: You sometimes refer to "International" Polaroid camera models.
What are those?
1.10.3: What about those "Special Markets" camera models you
talk about? What does that mean?
2: Rollfilm Camera Questions
2.1: Conversion-related Questions:
2.1.1: I'm looking for an old Pathfinder camera to have converted to pack film.
I know where I can get an original Model 110 in good shape-- should I buy
it?
2.1.2: Is there a way I can convert a 110-series camera to packfilm by myself? I'm
pretty handy with tools and mechanical things.
The good news is that it is indeed possible, and can be done
at very little cost in terms of parts if expense if a primary concern
(most notably by 'scavenging'
a film back by cutting it of a cheap yard-sale plastic pack
film camera).
2.1.3: OK, so it's not all that easy to put a pack film back on my Pathfinder.
How about I remove the lens/shutter assembly and attach it to the front of
a cheap folding pack camera? That sounds like that'd be easier, wouldn't
it?
One company, Graphic Center (see the links page),
even offers this sort of conversion service. I haven't seen an
example of their work in person, but I now have a similarly converted camera
that was "home-brewed" by someone else. While I'll admit that
the converted camera works out better than I expected, you should keep in
mind that there are some "hidden" pitfalls to this type of project.
Such as? Well, for one thing, the focal length
of the Pathfinder lens is not the same as the one originally built into
the automatic pack cameras (127mm versus 114mm). Since the scissors struts on those cameras
are rivited in place and not adjustable, you may have a problem
getting inifinty focus reset for the new lens (though careful mounting of the
Pathfinder lens at the very front of the original shutter/lens housing just
about compensates for this difference all by itself). Second, even after
you resolve that issue, the rangefinder is still going to be inaccurate
since the focus 'curve' of the new lens will differ from the original
factory one. Even Graphic Center admits this sort of rangefinder
inaccuracy in the advertising for their cameras converted in this
manner, so I imagine that recalibrating the rangefinder is impractical
and out of the question. In the case of my converted camera, the
rangefinder was "recalibrated" by simply bending the coupling
arm on the focus rail slightly. The result is that rangefinder accuracy
is improved, but still doesn't quite "track" the focus curve of the lens
properly. The basic issue here is that the advantage of having a faster
lens on your camera is partially lost if you can't focus it accurately
at those wider apertures. In any case, if anyone out there has attempted
this sort of conversion themselves I'd appreciate
it if you would drop me a note about your experience. Overall, though,
my feeling is that this would be considerably easier than converting a
Pathfinder back, but will probably result in a less satisfactory
photographic instrument by comparison.
2.2: I made a battery pack for my Wink-Light, but whenever I attach it to my
camera, the bulb comes on and stays lit until I detatch the Wink-Light!
2.3: Film-related Questions
2.3.1: Is there some other kind of film I can use in my old Polaroid rollfilm camera?
2.3.2: I know it's not being made anymore, but I really really really
want to get some 40-series film to use in my old Polaroid rollfilm camera.
Where can I buy some?
2.4: I just bought an old Polaroid rollfilm camera and it came with some old film, but no instruction manual. I'd like to try the old film anyway, but how do I work the camera?
2.5: How do I set the shutter speed and aperture on this thing?
All I see is a little window that has a number in it that I can change
using a wheel on the side of the shutter, but that number is
obviously not the shutter speed.
2.6: I just bought an old Polaroid rollfilm camera, but I found
these two metal round things rattling around inside the camera back!
Are these important? Where do they go? Is my camera broken?
3: Packfilm Camera Questions
3.1: Choosing / Purchasing a Polaroid Packfilm Camera
3.1.1: I want a Polaroid pack-film camera! What are some good used
models to look for? Where might I find a used pack camera? Are there
any such cameras still being made that I can buy new?
The best of the automatic folding pack camera line would include the
Model 100,
240,
250,
350,
360 and
450.
Any of these are definitely well
worth using, and are pretty similar both in appearance and performance.
Here's a bit of a 'scorecard' to help select one if you have
a choice, though:
After these 6 models, the next-most worthwhile of the automatic folding
pack cameras would include the
230,
340 and
440.
These cameras
have the same lens and all the features of the Automatic 100,
but have a plastic body and shutter housing (and no tripod socket).
The 230 is especially common among this group. Cameras I'd particularly stay
away from (if you're looking for a camera to buy) are the low-end
104 and
210.
3.1.2: I've found a used 'classic' pack camera! How can I check it to
make sure it works properly?
[Extra hint: if the "shutter
test" above indicated that the battery was dead, and (a) this
camera has the electronic development timer, and (b) both batteries
are installed, try swapping around the two batteries and then
repeat the shutter test. In these situations, sometimes only one
of the batteries is really 'dead', and the original timer battery
still has enough charge to operate the shutter. Make sure you
orient the batteries correctly if you swap them around-- don't
connect them backwards!]
3.3: What film types work best with old folding pack cameras?
My instruction manual mentions Type 107 and 108, but I can't seem to find those.
3.4: Are there any particularly useful accessories I should
try to find
for my classic pack camera?
These are very well-designed and well-worth owning. Not only do
each of them include the necessary close-up lens, but also include
matching "goggles" for the camera's range/view finder.
Prisms in the "goggles" adapt the rangefinder focus and
correct the viewfinder's parallax so you can easily and accurately
focus and compose at the range of focus allowed by the Kits.
The focus range of Portrait Kits is between 19 and 43 inches
(48cm - 109cm), and the range of Close-Up Kits is 9 to 19 inches
(23cm - 48cm).
There are several different models of these kits-- make sure the Kit(s)
you buy is/are one(s) that will work with your particular camera
[The "goggles" are the key component here.]
See the accessories page for more details
about the individual models.
These cameras have no real means of attaching a standard threaded
cable release, so if you want a cable release for your camera, you
will probably want to seek out this accessory. Unfortunately, it
does not seem to be nearly as common as most packfilm camera
accessories.
If you need a self-timer, you'll find this accessory useful. If you
don't need one, then you won't. The #192 was apparently rather
popular, because it's one of the more common accessories. One
note: The timing mechanism does not leave the shutter button
pressed down after it completes its cycle; therefore you cannot use this
as a cable-release 'substitute' for time-exposures.
[For 100-, 200-, and 300-series cameras (except 360) only]
Extremely common. As an M3 flashgun, it's fairly well-designed (though
replacing the battery isn't as convenient as it should be).
However, keeping it fed with M3 flashbulbs in this day and age could
become a bit problematic if you take a lot of flash pictures.
[See my HowTo: Using Electronic Flash with Classic Pack Cameras
page for some alternative suggestions.]
Still, it's worth having a #268 (along with a couple boxes of M3
flashbulbs), as it's pretty much guaranteed to work properly without
any additional guesswork.
[For 400-series cameras only]
Most of my same comments pertaining to the #268 also apply to this
flashgun; just replace the words "M3 flashbulbs" with
"Hi-Power Flashcubes". Oh, and the batteries are easier
to replace in this one.
Polaroid refers to this orange filter as a "cloud filter". Why?
Because an orange-colored filter will reduce blue light, thus making
(white) clouds stand out more sharply against the (blue) sky when
using B&W film. It can help with certain other photographic
problems in B&W as well. If you shoot mostly color film, you
probably won't find this accessory very useful.
Can improve contrast in color outdoor photos, but probably won't
have much effect in most situations. Also, it's not that common
anyway. I'd pass on this one unless it just happens to come with
the camera outfit you bought.
3.5: My camera needs a new battery; where can I get one?
3.6: About how long do those batteries last anyway?
3.7: But I don't want a Polaroid pack camera with automatic exposure!
Weren't there any with manual exposure settings instead?
3.8: Flashbulb-related Questions:
3.8.1: Where can I find M3 flashbulbs? Do they ever go 'bad' from old age?
Can I use M3B flashbulbs or something else instead if I can't find any?
3.8.2: What about Flashcubes and Hi-Power Flashcubes?
3.8.3: What about Magicubes?
3.8.4: I'm confused-- how can you tell the difference between these types of flashcubes?
Hi-Power Flashcubes: These look like regular Flashcubes, but all the
ones I've seen have a red-colored base and are labeled as "Hi-Power"
on the top. It appears that the vast majority of these were made by
General Electric and Sylvania.
Magicubes: These are slightly larger than regular Flashcubes and have
no visible electrical contacts anywhere on the cube's surface. The base
is usually/always black in color, and the top usually/always is marked
with a large "X". Most of these seem to have been made by
either Sylvania or GE. Incidently, the reason there are no electrical
contacts is that Magicubes are ignited by a mechanical (piezo-mechanical?)
process-- a retractable pin inside the camera's flash socket physically
strikes another pin in the base of the flashbulb, which in turn causes the
flash to go off. This system requires no batteries for operation,
hence the "magic" part of the name.
3.8.5: What about AG-1 bulbs?
3.8.6: Wait-- just how many times can I use these 'flashbulb' things before they burn out?
3.8.7: Most of my flashbulbs / Flashcubes have a blue dot on each
bulb, but I just found one that has a bright pink dot instead. Does
that mean anything?
3.9: I just bought an old folding pack camera, and I'm sure I'm using it
correctly, but my pictures are consistently a bit dark. If I set the
L/D control a mark or two towards Lighten then my prints turn out just
fine, though. I've checked the battery, and it's good. What's wrong?
3.10: I have a Model 180 / 190 / 195 professional pack camera, and I'd
like to get one of the old Close-Up or Portrait kits that were available
for it. I'm having trouble finding the correct kit, however-- all I
can find are the ones for the Automatic pack cameras. Is there a way
I can adapt one of these for my camera instead?
3.11: Are there any wide angle or telephoto lenses available for
'classic' folding pack cameras?
NOTE: On the other hand, I would like to point out that not all
supplementary lens attachments for all cameras are necessarily bad.
Some supplementary lenses, when designed specifically for a particular lens and
(usually) produced by the same company that made the original
lens itself, can be of high quality indeed. Examples include
the Zeiss Mutars made for certain specific Zeiss cameras, and even
Polaroid's own telephoto attachment for the folding SX-70 cameras.
3.12: Someone told me that some of the old folding pack cameras have Zeiss
lenses. Is this true?
4. SX-70 Camera Questions
4.1: How do I unfold this thing anyway??
To fold the camera again, push on the side strut in the direction of the
arrow (there's an arc-shaped notch cut in the strut to indicate where to
put your finger) until it releases, and just press down on the top of the
camera until it snaps shut.
Easy once you've actually done it, eh?
4.2: How do I hold a folding SX-70 for taking a picture?
I generally use a slight variant of this grip in which the thumb of
the right hand rests on the back of the shutter housing (again,
take care that you don't press in on the bellows!), with the index
and middle fingers on the focus wheel and shutter button respectively.
The remaining two fingers rest somewhere on the bottom of the camera.
4.3: I'm looking for a folding SX-70! When I find one, how can
I evaluate/test it before I buy?
Now, unfold the camera. [Use the instructions from
FAQ question 4.1
if you don't know how to unfold it.] The camera should latch positively
and securely when unfolded all the way. If the camera refuses
to stay "locked" in its unfolded position, re-fold it and give
it another try or two. If it shows improvement after a couple of
retries, then it might just be that the camera hasn't been
unfolded for a long time and is "stiff." However, if it
doesn't improve, then check to see if the metal strut on the side of
the camera is bent or broken,
or if there has been damage to the camera body and/or hinges.
4.4: Can I get an instruction manual for my SX-70?
4.5: My folding SX-70 jammed while taking a picture! Can I fix it?
Whatever you do, do not attempt to close the camera if it's
stuck like this. Specifically, if the moving mirror is not in its fully
downward (normal) position, you run a definite risk of breaking the mirror
or the mechanism that controls it.
4.6: Where can I get an electronic flash for my folding SX-70 camera?
4.7: Can I convert my SX-70 camera to use 600 film?
4.8: The stationary mirror on my folding SX-70 broke! Is this easy to fix?
6: Miscellaneous Format Questions
6.1: I'm looking for a 4x5 Polaroid film back. I heard somewhere that the
#500 film holder won't work with current Polaroid 4x5 film-- is that
correct?
6.2: I just bought a used 4x5 Polaroid film back for my 4x5 camera,
but it didn't
have its original instruction sheet. How do I use this thing anyway?
NOTE: Just as with a Polaroid pack camera, you should occasionaly
check the development rollers on your 4x5 film holder and clean them
if necessary. There is a sliding latch on the film holder that
exposes the rollers for inspection/cleaning.
6.3: I have a bunch of my family's old home movies that were taken on
Polavision Phototapes. How can I have these transferred to video tape?
All Rights Reserved Worldwide